青青草a国产免费观看|91麻豆精品国产福利|国产av五无码一级毛片|亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区|久久亚洲AV成人无码国产|91无码人妻一区二区三区|色婷婷av一区二区三区性色|国产制服91一区二区三区制服,女人书籍排行榜,盗墓笔记小说txt下载,玄幻小说排行榜完本

position: EnglishChannel  > Policy> National Sci-Tech Awards Nomination Regulations Updated

National Sci-Tech Awards Nomination Regulations Updated

Source: Science and Technology Daily | 2023-12-19 14:40:44 | Author: ZHONG Jianli


Engineers conduct equipment debugging for the Comprehensive Research Facility for Fusion Technology (CRAFT) system, one of China's major scientific engineering projects. (PHOTO: XINHUA)

By ZHONG Jianli

The Ministry of Science and Technology of China recently issued the Regulations on Nomination for National Science and Technology Awards, in a bid to further standardize the nomination process for the awards and motivate scientists' enthusiasm for sci-tech innovation.

The newly released regulations state that the nomination for national science and technology awards should strengthen incentives for basic research in natural science and applied science. It encourages both cutting-edge technology research and research with social welfare implications.

Moreover, the regulations have emphasized the support for national major sci-tech missions, major sci-tech infrastructure, and vital engineering projects.

Of particular note is that the regulations stress importance of creative contributions of nominees, stating that nominees should be scientists and front-line technical personnel who have genuinely made creative contributions.

Eligible nominators include recipients of the highest national sci-tech awards, academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering, as well as individuals who have been primary awardees for National Natural Science Awards of second class or higher, National Technology Invention Awards of first class or higher, and National Science and Technology Progress Awards of first class or higher since the year 2000.

The nominators themselves should not be candidates for the national sci-tech awards in the same year, and should not participate in the evaluation of awards in which they have proposed nominees.

To improve the nomination process, the regulations call for increased academic oversight. Before nominations are made, the opinions of no fewer than five experts in the relevant professional fields need to be sought.

In terms of maintaining discipline and fostering a positive atmosphere, the regulations outline several measures, including establishing a clear supervisory mechanism, exerting stricter penalties for violations, and setting up a "blacklist" credit management system.

That means the names of individuals and organizations engaging in dishonest behavior during the nomination process will be recorded in the database, and punitive measures will be implemented in accordance with relevant national regulations.

Editor:鐘建麗

抱歉,您使用的瀏覽器版本過低或開啟了瀏覽器兼容模式,這會影響您正常瀏覽本網(wǎng)頁

您可以進行以下操作:

1.將瀏覽器切換回極速模式

2.點擊下面圖標升級或更換您的瀏覽器

3.暫不升級,繼續(xù)瀏覽

繼續(xù)瀏覽
洛南县| 织金县| 塔河县| 荆门市| 锦州市| 中卫市| 廊坊市| 常德市| 贵南县| 合阳县| 怀宁县| 商都县| 庆安县| 湟源县| 宝丰县| 镇沅| 兴宁市| 正镶白旗| 申扎县| 抚宁县| 兰溪市| 浮梁县| 虎林市| 长岭县| 双牌县| 大新县| 东海县| 清原| 萨嘎县| 东乡族自治县| 东方市| 墨江| 赣州市| 房山区| 苏州市| 宜州市| 浏阳市| 石阡县| 云林县| 德兴市| 桃江县|